Howard Lutnick Pushes Plan to Keep Trump’s Name on Kennedy Center as Federal Judge Grills DOJ

Breaking

A federal judge sharply pressed Justice Department lawyers at an emergency hearing Wednesday over the Kennedy Center Board’s plan to add President Trump’s name to the building’s facade, telling attorneys bluntly, “Congress gave the Kennedy Center its name, and only Congress can change it.” U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper, who had already ruled in May that the Board’s earlier renaming attempt “violated federal law,” questioned whether the facade-text plan was simply an end-run around that ruling, at one point asking DOJ lawyers, “What does that have to do with what Congress intended in the statutes?”

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who also sits on the Kennedy Center’s board, stood outside the courthouse during the hearing and made the administration’s case directly to reporters, describing his proposed text: “Underneath the name of the building, which will remain the John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts, ‘Renovated and Restored by President Donald J. Trump.'” He downplayed the urgency of the dispute, saying, “Bad things happen, but they’re not going to happen on Thursday. No one’s saying it’s happening on Thursday.”

Details & Background

The case traces to a lawsuit filed by Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH), who serves as an ex officio trustee of the Kennedy Center, arguing that Congress — not the Board or the President — has sole authority to rename the institution, which is chartered by federal statute as a living memorial to President Kennedy. Judge Cooper agreed in May, ruling the Board’s renaming vote legally void. Wednesday’s emergency hearing centered on whether the Board’s new plan, adding descriptive credit text rather than formally changing the name, amounted to defiance of that ruling.

DOJ attorney Brantley T. Mayers argued in court that “there is no renaming here,” maintaining the center would remain a “living memorial” to Kennedy regardless of any added text. But Judge Cooper pushed back skeptically, asking at one point whether “the whole thing would be for sale, basically — and that would be consistent with Congress’ overall scheme.” In a written filing, DOJ warned that without proceeding with renovation plans tied to the naming dispute, the building would “deteriorate further into an unsafe, decrepit structure” and donors would “flee.”

Reactions

Beatty’s attorney, Nathaniel Zelinsky, argued the facade-text plan amounts to “outright defiance” of Cooper’s earlier ruling. Beatty herself, in the release announcing her original lawsuit, said “only Congress has the authority to rename the Kennedy Center” and accused the administration of trying to trample federal law and bypass Congress. Ambassador Norman Eisen of Democracy Defenders Action, involved in supporting the case, said “the President and his sycophants have no lawful authority to rename the Kennedy Center.”

Lutnick, for his part, cast the naming fight in starkly different terms, framing it as recognition rather than overreach: “I mean, this is the board classically capturing the greatest fundraiser and greatest builder ever by putting his name on it and saying, ‘OK, OK, you wanted your name. Here it is. Now go do it.'” No additional administration officials have weighed in publicly beyond Lutnick’s courthouse remarks.

Why This Matters to You

Following Wednesday’s hearing, the Board agreed to hold off on adding any Trump-related text to the building’s facade or plaza until at least October 8, 2026 — pushed back roughly a month from the September 8 date originally floated, while Judge Cooper considers whether the plan violates federal law. That delay buys time for the litigation to play out rather than resolving it.

The underlying question — whether a presidentially-appointed board can attach a president’s name to a congressionally-chartered national memorial without lawmakers’ approval — remains unsettled, and Wednesday’s skeptical questioning from the bench suggests the administration will need more than a rebranded plaque to win the legal argument. Expect further hearings before any final resolution, and expect Lutnick and other administration officials to keep making their case in public even as it plays out in court.