The House of Representatives passed the Secure America Act on Tuesday, a roughly $70 billion bill designed to fully fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the U.S. Border Patrol through the remainder of President Donald Trump’s second term. The vote, 214 to 212, was almost entirely along party lines, capping months of bitter political warfare
The House of Representatives passed the Secure America Act on Tuesday, a roughly $70 billion bill designed to fully fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the U.S. Border Patrol through the remainder of President Donald Trump’s second term.
The vote, 214 to 212, was almost entirely along party lines, capping months of bitter political warfare on Capitol Hill over the future of federal immigration enforcement.
The legislation now heads to President Trump’s desk, where he is expected to sign it without delay. Senate Republicans cleared the bill last week after a marathon session, and the White House has made no secret of its enthusiasm for the measure.
Trump signed it into law on Wednesday, the day after the House vote.
The bill, dubbed the Secure America Act, departs from the usual federal funding model. Rather than relying on annual appropriations, it provides three years of advance lump-sum funding for both ICE and Customs and Border Protection, covering agency expenditures through September 30, 2029.
Republican leaders argued that the multi-year structure is precisely what the agencies need to operate without the perpetual threat of politically driven funding gaps.
Under the terms of the legislation, roughly $38.5 billion is directed to ICE, covering personnel hiring, salaries, training, and operations. This includes $7 billion specifically dedicated to Homeland Security Investigations agents.
An additional $22.6 billion flows to Customs and Border Protection, including the Border Patrol, covering staffing and enforcement technology.
The Department of Homeland Security receives a separate $5 billion pool to be controlled by Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, and roughly $3.5 billion is reserved for border security infrastructure.
Republicans used the budget reconciliation process to pass the legislation, a procedural maneuver that allowed them to sidestep a potential Senate filibuster and push the bill through without a single Democratic vote.
House Appropriations Committee Chairman Tom Cole of Oklahoma praised the outcome, saying the bill ensures that ICE and Border Patrol agents confronting terrorists, cartels, human traffickers, and drug smugglers have the resources they need to do their jobs.
Border Czar Tom Homan was emphatic in his support, saying the funding would allow his agencies to keep their foot on the gas on enforcement. Homan noted that the bill would enable ICE to increase targeting, boost arrests, and pay its medical and operational contractors, all of which had been squeezed during the preceding funding standoff.
The road to passage was not smooth. For months, Democratic lawmakers refused to authorize new funding for ICE or Border Patrol unless the legislation was paired with sweeping policy reforms to immigration enforcement.
That standoff triggered what became the longest government shutdown of any federal department in American history, with the Department of Homeland Security losing funding for 75 days beginning in February after Senate Democrats voted to defund it.
The DHS shutdown was sparked in January when two American citizens, Renee Good and Alex Pretti, were killed by federal law enforcement officers during immigration operations in Minneapolis.
Democrats seized on the deaths to demand accountability and oversight reforms, tying those demands to any future ICE or Border Patrol appropriations. Republicans accused them of using the tragedy as a pretext to defang federal immigration enforcement.
A partial resolution came in April, when Trump signed legislation that restored funding for most DHS components, including the Coast Guard, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Transportation Security Administration, and the Secret Service, while leaving the ICE and Border Patrol funding question unresolved.
That deal essentially bought time for Congress to negotiate a longer-term solution, though those negotiations ultimately collapsed and Republicans opted for the reconciliation route.
The vote was not without dissent from the right. Representative Kevin Kiley, a California lawmaker who recently switched his party affiliation from Republican to independent, joined all Democrats in voting against the bill.
Kiley argued that using reconciliation to fund law enforcement agencies set a dangerous precedent by bypassing the traditional bipartisan appropriations process. He expressed concern that both parties would use such procedural shortcuts in the future whenever they failed to reach bipartisan consensus.
Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina was quick to praise the outcome. He credited House Republicans with completing the task despite Democratic opposition and noted that with the Secure America Act now law, both ICE and the Border Patrol are funded for the entirety of Trump’s second term.
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise of Louisiana also voted in favor and said the legislation ensures that federal law enforcement officers have the resources needed to keep communities safe. Representative David Kustoff of Tennessee echoed those remarks, saying the bill provides ICE and CBP with the sustained funding needed to carry out their missions through September 30, 2029.
The Secure America Act represents the second major infusion of funds for immigration enforcement under the Trump administration.
The president’s earlier domestic policy legislation, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, had already delivered a $75 billion allocation to ICE, making it the most heavily funded federal law enforcement agency in the country at that time.
Critics pointed out that the new legislation adds tens of billions more on top of that, with Democratic Representative Morgan McGarvey of Kentucky saying on the House floor that Republicans had handed ICE a total of $240 billion in under a year.
Democrats broadly opposed the measure, framing it as a blank check for agencies they accused of conducting reckless and abusive enforcement operations.
The party’s opposition remained steady heading into the final vote, with members arguing that the bill poured taxpayer money into agencies without accountability or reform measures attached.
Conservative and Republican support organizations rallied behind the bill. The Republican Governors Association sent a letter urging swift enactment.
The Conservative Action Project called the passage an urgent constitutional obligation. The Immigration Accountability Project said the men and women of ICE and the Border Patrol deserved to know they would be paid for their work.
The Independent Women’s Forum also urged House passage after the Senate approved the bill, saying the legislation was a necessary step in restoring stability to federal immigration enforcement after months of political obstruction.
The passage of the Secure America Act marks the formal end of what Republican leaders described as a 115-day standoff over immigration policy.
It is also expected to become a central talking point heading into the November midterm elections, as Republicans seek to highlight their record on border security while Democrats defend their opposition to new ICE funding.
For the agencies themselves, the relief is immediate. ICE and Border Patrol have been operating under significant financial strain since the beginning of the DHS shutdown, and the new legislation provides enough runway to hire additional personnel, renew contracts, and sustain enforcement operations without interruption.